A Public Interest Litigation filed by the Mehkar Bar Association was dismissed by the Nagpur Bench of the High Court of Bombay as infructuous, as the counsel stated the grievance had already been redressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1001pil128.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
P.I.L. No.128 of 2017
Mehkar Bar Association, through its President Adv. Kishor K. Deshmukh, and another Versus
State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secretary, Department of Law and Judiciary, Mumbai, and others.
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order
Shri K.V. Deshmukh, Advocate for Petitioners.
Shri D.P. Thakre, Additional Government Pleader for Respondents.
Coram : R.K. Deshpande & Vinay Joshi, JJ. Dated : 10th January, 2019
The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the grievance made by the petitioners has already been redressed. Hence, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Vinay Joshi, J.) (R.K. Deshpande, J.)
Lanjewar
Mehkar Bar Association
Kishor K. Deshmukh
State of Maharashtra
D.P. Thakre
R.K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
