Proposed inclusion of Aamgaon (Khurd) in Salekasa Nagar Panchayat already accepted per mutual counsel agreement; P.I.L. dismissed without further inquiry.
P.I.L. No.116 of 2017 is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1001pil116.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
P.I.L. No.116 of 2017 Brajbhushan Singh s/o Jageshwar Singh Bais, Gondia, and another Versus
The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Revenue and Urban Development, Mantralaya, Mumbai, and others.
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order
Shri A.D. Mohgaonkar, Advocate for Petitioners.
Shri S.Y. Deopujari, Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Shri J.B. Kasat, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
Coram : R.K. Deshpande & Vinay Joshi, JJ. Dated : 10th January, 2019
The proposal for inclusion of Aamgaon (Khurd) in Salekasa Nagar Panchayat has already been accepted, and this is the statement made by all the learned counsels appearing for the parties. Hence, we do not find any reason to proceed further in the matter.
The P.I.L. stands dismissed.
(Vinay Joshi, J.) (R.K. Deshpande, J.)
Lanjewar
Brajbhushan Singh s/o Jageshwar Singh Bais
State of Maharashtra
R.K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
