The single-judge bench dismissed the PIL maintaining that the issue regarding constructions in CRZ areas is already monitored in PIL No. 107 of 2009. The petition was not entertained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) PIL 110-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Amk
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 110 OF 2019
Pradeep Govind Bhalekar .. Petitioner Vs.
The Ministry of Environment and Forests (MOEF) & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Nitin S. Satpute for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. P. Kakade, Govt. Pleader a/w. Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATE : 17th OCTOBER, 2019.
P. C. :
[SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.]
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
1/1
Pradeep Govind Bhalekar
The Ministry of Environment and Forests
Pradeep Nandrajog
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
