The High Court of Bombay allowed the notice of motion condoning a 27-day delay in filing an appeal against the Single Judge's order disposing of an arbitration petition, noting the delay was not very convincing but minor.
Notice of Motion allowed and 27 days delay in lodging the Appeal condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(5) NMA 708-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Amk
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 708 OF 2019 IN
APPEAL (L) NO. 557 OF 2018 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 1022 OF 2016
M/s. Grace Gharunda .. Applicant
In the matter between
M/s. Grace Gharunda .. Appellant Vs.
Mrs. Naina Fernandez & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Rehan Chhapra a/w. Mr. Syed Mauzam Bukhari for the Applicant. Ms. Amruta Athavale i/b R. C. Dhuru for the Respondents.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATE : 17th OCTOBER, 2019.
P. C. :
1/2
(5) NMA 708-19.doc
allow the Notice of Motion and condone the 27 days delay in lodging the Appeal.
[SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.]
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 27 days in filing the appeal can be condoned.
M/s. Grace Gharunda
Mrs. Naina Fernandez & Ors.
Pradeep Nandrajog
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
