Disposed

Luis Santan Coleco v. the Honble Grievance Redressal Committee and 5 Ors.

Bombay HC5 Apr 2019NMW/40/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In connected writ petitions, the court accepted undertakings from the fifth respondent to hand over transit camp tenements within six weeks. Consequently, the notices of motion for non-compliance were disposed of without granting specific relief.

What did the court decide?

Undertakings accepted; period for possession extended by six weeks; notices of motion disposed of.

Luis Santan Coleco Vs the Honble Grievance Redressal… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

SKN

¶2

1/3 35.19-nmw--.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 35 OF 2019 IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 647 OF 2018

¶6

Laxman V. Mukera. … Applicant.

¶7

In the matter between

¶8

Laxman V. Mukera. … Petitioner. V/s. The Hon’ble Grievance Redressal Committee and others. … Respondents.

¶9

… Respondents.

¶10

WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 40 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 644 OF 2018

¶11

Luis Santan Coleco. … Applicant.

¶12

In the matter between Luis Santan Coleco. … Petitioner. V/s.

¶13

The Hon’ble Grievance Redressal Committee and others.

¶14

… Respondents.

¶15

WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 41 OF 2019

¶16

¶17

WRIT PETITION NO. 650 OF 2018

¶18

Primo Joseph Cross. … Applicant. In the matter between Primo Joseph Cross. … Petitioner. V/s.

¶19

The Hon’ble Grievance Redressal Committee and others.

¶20

… Respondents.

¶21

WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 42 OF 2019

¶22

¶23

WRIT PETITION NO. 646 OF 2018

¶24

SKN 2/3 35.19-nmw--.doc

¶25

Prem Ramesh Soshte. … Applicant. In the matter between Prem Ramesh Soshte. … Petitioner. V/s. The Hon’ble Grievance Redressal Committee and others. … Respondents.

¶26

WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 43 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 649 OF 2018

¶27

Sanjay Jiva Solanki. … Applicant. In the matter between Sanjay Jiva Solanki. … Petitioner. V/s.

¶28

The Hon’ble Grievance Redressal Committee and others.

¶29

… Respondents.

¶30

Mr.Akshay Patil with Mr.Sandeep Dhangar, Mr.Paras S. Gosar i/b. Advocate Jayesh R. Vyas for the applicants in all matters. Mr.Chirag Balsara with Mr.Durgesh Kulkarni i/b. Mr.Yuvraj D. Patil for respondent No.5. in all matters.

¶31

CORAM : A.S.OKA AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 5^th April 2019.

¶32

P.C.:

¶33

These notices of motion have been taken out essentially making a grievance about the non-compliance of the directions/ undertakings recorded in the order dated 13^th February 2018 in the disposed of petitions. Mr.Indraneel Roy, partner of the fifth respondent has filed undertakings-cum-affidavits in these notices of motion wherein

¶34

SKN 3/3 35.19-nmw--.doc

¶35

he has given an undertaking to complete the construction of transit camp tenements at site and hand over possession of the same to the petitioners in writ petitions within six weeks from today. Further undertaking is given not to seek extension of time. As the fifth respondent has undertaken to place the petitioners in possession of transit camp tenements within a period of six weeks from today, it is not necessary to grant any relief in these notices of motion. Accordingly, we dispose of these notices of motion by passing the following order:

¶36

O R D E R

¶37

(i) The undertakings of the fifth respondent incorporated in paragraphs-1 and 2 of the affidavits tendered on record today and marked as “U-1” for identification are accepted;

¶38

(ii) In view of the undertakings, the period provided in the orders passed in the writ petitions for handing over possession of the transit camp tenements is extended by a period of six weeks from today. We make it clear that if any breach is committed by the fifth respondent of the undertakings which are accepted by this order, it would be an aggravated contempt;

¶39

(iii) Notices of motion are disposed of.

¶40

(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)

Luis Santan Coleco v. the Honble Grievance Redressal Committee and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Luis Santan Coleco v. the Honble Grievance Redressal Committee and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Bms Chemie and Anr. Vs Union of India and Anr.

The Commissioner of Cgst and Central Excise Vs Vikhroli Corporate Park Pvt. Ltd.

The Senior Divisional Manager Life Insurance Corpn of India Vs Office of the Insurance Ombudsman and Anr.

The Commissioner of Cgst and Central Excise, Navi Mumbai Commissionerate Vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Prem Ramesh Soshte Vs the Hon'Ble Grievance Redressal Committee and Ors. 5

Devendra Pandya Vs Union of India and Another