The Commissioner of Cgst and Central Excise, Navi Mumbai Commissionerate v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SKN
1/1 171.19-nma.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 171 OF 2019 IN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 232 OF 2018
The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise. … Applicant. In the matter between The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise. … Appellant. V/s. M/s.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. … Respondent.
Mr.Vijay Kantharia with Ram Ochani for the applicant. Mr.Kiran Chavan for the respondent
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 5th April 2019.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. There is sufficient cause made out to condone delay of 18 days. Notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
Parties & counsel
- applicant
The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise
- respondent
M/s.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Coram
A.S.OSKA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/S.Bms Chemie and Anr. Vs Union of India and Anr.
The Commissioner of Cgst and Central Excise Vs Vikhroli Corporate Park Pvt. Ltd.
The Senior Divisional Manager Life Insurance Corpn of India Vs Office of the Insurance Ombudsman and Anr.
Luis Santan Coleco Vs the Honble Grievance Redressal Committee and 5 Ors.