Disposed

Laxman v. Mukera v the Hon'Ble Grievance Redressal Committee and Ors. 5

Bombay HC5 Apr 2019NMW/35/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court accepted undertakings from the fifth respondent to complete and hand over transit camp tenements. Consequently, the order periods were extended by six weeks, and the notices of motion were disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Extension of the period for handing over possession of transit camp tenements by six weeks from the date of the order.

Laxman v. Mukera Vs the Hon'Ble… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

SKN

¶2

1/3 35.19-nmw--.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 35 OF 2019 IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 647 OF 2018

¶6

Laxman V. Mukera. … Applicant.

¶7

In the matter between

¶8

Laxman V. Mukera. … Petitioner. V/s. The Hon’ble Grievance Redressal Committee and others. … Respondents.

¶9

… Respondents.

¶10

WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 40 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 644 OF 2018

¶11

Luis Santan Coleco. … Applicant.

¶12

In the matter between Luis Santan Coleco. … Petitioner. V/s.

¶13

The Hon’ble Grievance Redressal Committee and others.

¶14

… Respondents.

¶15

WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 41 OF 2019

¶16

¶17

WRIT PETITION NO. 650 OF 2018

¶18

Primo Joseph Cross. … Applicant. In the matter between Primo Joseph Cross. … Petitioner. V/s.

¶19

The Hon’ble Grievance Redressal Committee and others.

¶20

… Respondents.

¶21

WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 42 OF 2019

¶22

¶23

WRIT PETITION NO. 646 OF 2018

¶24

SKN 2/3 35.19-nmw--.doc

¶25

Prem Ramesh Soshte. … Applicant. In the matter between Prem Ramesh Soshte. … Petitioner. V/s. The Hon’ble Grievance Redressal Committee and others. … Respondents.

¶26

WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 43 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 649 OF 2018

¶27

Sanjay Jiva Solanki. … Applicant. In the matter between Sanjay Jiva Solanki. … Petitioner. V/s.

¶28

The Hon’ble Grievance Redressal Committee and others.

¶29

… Respondents.

¶30

Mr.Akshay Patil with Mr.Sandeep Dhangar, Mr.Paras S. Gosar i/b. Advocate Jayesh R. Vyas for the applicants in all matters. Mr.Chirag Balsara with Mr.Durgesh Kulkarni i/b. Mr.Yuvraj D. Patil for respondent No.5. in all matters.

¶31

CORAM : A.S.OKA AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 5^th April 2019.

¶32

P.C.:

¶33

These notices of motion have been taken out essentially making a grievance about the non-compliance of the directions/ undertakings recorded in the order dated 13^th February 2018 in the disposed of petitions. Mr.Indraneel Roy, partner of the fifth respondent has filed undertakings-cum-affidavits in these notices of motion wherein

¶34

SKN 3/3 35.19-nmw--.doc

¶35

he has given an undertaking to complete the construction of transit camp tenements at site and hand over possession of the same to the petitioners in writ petitions within six weeks from today. Further undertaking is given not to seek extension of time. As the fifth respondent has undertaken to place the petitioners in possession of transit camp tenements within a period of six weeks from today, it is not necessary to grant any relief in these notices of motion. Accordingly, we dispose of these notices of motion by passing the following order:

¶36

O R D E R

¶37

(i) The undertakings of the fifth respondent incorporated in paragraphs-1 and 2 of the affidavits tendered on record today and marked as “U-1” for identification are accepted;

¶38

(ii) In view of the undertakings, the period provided in the orders passed in the writ petitions for handing over possession of the transit camp tenements is extended by a period of six weeks from today. We make it clear that if any breach is committed by the fifth respondent of the undertakings which are accepted by this order, it would be an aggravated contempt;

¶39

(iii) Notices of motion are disposed of.

¶40

(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)

Laxman v. Mukera v the Hon'Ble Grievance Redressal Committee and Ors. 5

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Laxman v. Mukera v the Hon'Ble Grievance Redressal Committee and Ors. 5

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Kumar Agarwal Vs District Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Societies and 2 Ors.

Mahendra Amrutlal Vakharia Vs the State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

Apco Infratech Pvt.Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (Imports) and Anr.

Sanjay Jiva Solanki Vs the Hon'Ble Grievance Redressal Committee and Ors. 5

Primo Joseph Cross Vs the Hon'Ble Grievance Redressal Committee and Ors. 5

Kaushik Chimanbhai Mehta Vs Union of India and Anr.