The High Court at Bombay Commercial City dismissed a notice of motion in a commercial suit as withdrawn by the applicant after an interim application was heard.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
47.NMCDL-1810-2019.doc
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMMERCIAL NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO.1810 OF 2019
IN
COMMERCIAL SUIT (L) NO.815 OF 2019
Kinnary Vipul Sheth
....Applicant/Plaintiff
Vs.
Paresh H. Pujara and Ors. ....Defendants
Mr. Anoshak Daver a/w. Mr. Animesh Sinhg i/b. Mr. Dhiren H. Shah for
applicant/plaintiff.
Mr. Ashish Kamat i/b. Pradhan and Rao for defendant nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.
DATE : 19th AUGUST 2019
P.C.:
1When the matter was listed on 5th August 2019, it was stood
over to today. Today after the ad-interim application was heard for some
time and when the Court indicated that it was not inclined to grant
ad-interim, Mr. Daver sought leave to withdraw the notice of motion.
2Notice of motion dismissed as withdrawn.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Gauri Gaekwad
Kinnary Vipul Sheth
Paresh H. Pujara
K.R. SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court