Disposed
Ved Pmc Ltd. v. the Commissioner of Central Tax, Raigad
Bombay HCNMA/336/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
ssp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nma336.doc
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.336 OF 2019 IN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L)NO.39 OF 2019
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s ordersCourt’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Suyog Bhave and Mr.Jas Sanghvi I/b PDS Legal for
the Applicant
Mr.Sham Walve and Ms Sneha Prabhu for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ
DATE : APRIL 11, 2019
P.C.
1 Heard the learned counsel for the
applicant and the learned counsel for
the respondents. In view of the
averments made in paragraphs 6 to 8 of
the affidavit in support of the Notice
of Motion, a case for condonation of
delay is made out. Accordingly, Notice
of Motion is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a).
Applicant
Respondent
A.S.OKA
M.S.SANKLECHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court