This order grants the notice of motion in an appeal against order/notice. The bench found sufficient cause for adjournment based on affidavit averments and disposed of the issue by making the notice absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 nma-218.19.docx
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.218 OF 2019 IN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO.26 OF 2019
Narendra Mohanlal Surana … Applicant In the matter between Narendra Mohanlal Surana … Appellant Vs. The Commissioner of Central Tax, Pune III Commissionerate … Respondents
Ms. Shilpi Jain I/b. MAX Legal for the Applicant. Mr. Karan Adik and Mr. Ram Ochani for the Respondents.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 10th APRIL 2019.
P.C. :
1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. In view of the averments made in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the affidavit in support, sufficient cause is made out. Accordingly, notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is made out to adjourn the notice of motion under Central Excise Appeal (L) No.26 of 2019.
Narendra Mohanlal Surana
The Commissioner of Central Tax
A.S. Oka
M.S. Sanklecha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
