Allowed

The Commissioner of Income Tax-Iii, Nagpur v. Smt. Sitadevi W/O Puranlal Agrawal and 2 Others.

Bombay HC13 Dec 2019ITL/42/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the withdrawal of multiple Income Tax Appeals filed by appellants (IT Authorities) against respondents. Permission for withdrawing the appeals and refunding court fees was granted as the respondents had no objection.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw all appeals; Office directed to refund court fees if permissible by law.

The Commissioner of Income Tax-Iii, Nagpur Vs Smt. Sitadevi W/O… — Income Tax | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

1 902.ITA33.07.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.33/2007

¶4

The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV Vs. Ballarpur Industries Ltd.

¶5

WITH

¶6

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.89/2009 WITH

¶7

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.41/2009 WITH

¶8

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.42/2009

¶9

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III Vs. Puranlal Agrawal (Dead),Through LR’s.

¶10

WITH

¶11

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.43/2015

¶12

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur-1. Vs. Pushpendrakumar K. Sharma.

¶13

WITH

¶14

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.83/2015

¶15

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur-1. Vs. M/s. Rachana Construction Co.,

¶16

Nagpur.

¶17

WITH

¶18

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.7/2016

¶19

WITH

¶20

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.11/2016

¶21

WITH

¶22

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.13/2016

¶23

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Nagpur.

¶24

Vs.

¶25

M/s. Bharat Hardware & Iron Stores, Nagpur.

¶26

WITH

¶27

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.21/2016

¶28

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur-I, Nagpur.

¶29

Vs.

¶30

M/s. Leela Ventures India Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur.

¶31

WITH

¶32

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.75/2016

¶33

WITH

¶34

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.78/2016 WITH

¶35

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.79/2016

¶36

The Commissioner of Income Tax-TDS, Nagpur.

¶37

Vs.

¶38

The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India Ltd, Amravati.

¶39

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.99/2017

¶40

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur-3. Vs. Khalid Nadeem Allarakha.

¶41

2 902.ITA33.07.odt

¶42

…........................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of

¶43

Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders

¶44

In all Income Tax Appeals.

¶45

Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the Appellant. In ITA No. 33/07, 89/09, 41/09, 42/09, 83/15, 7/16, 11/16, 13/16.

¶46

Shri K. P. Dewani, Advocate for respondent. In ITA No.43/15.

¶47

Shri Rohit Thakar h/f Shri S.C.Thakar, Advocate for respondent. In ITA No.75/16, 78/16, 79/16.

¶48

Shri Ankit Kathane, Advocate for respondent.

¶49

CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 13^th DECEMBER, 2019.

¶50

. The Commissioner of Income Tax has filed pursis in all these matters seeking permission to withdraw the Appeals and for refund of court fees as per the law. The respondent has no objection. Hence, all these Appeals are permitted to be withdrawn and Office is directed to refund the court fee, if permissible in accordance with law.

¶51

JUDGE JUDGE

¶52

RGurnule

The Commissioner of Income Tax-Iii, Nagpur v. Smt. Sitadevi W/O Puranlal Agrawal and 2 Others.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Commissioner of Income Tax-Iii, Nagpur v. Smt. Sitadevi W/O Puranlal Agrawal and 2 Others.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Zahid S/O Mohammad Lukman Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary Revenue and Forest Department, Mumbai and Others

Waman S/O Lobhaji Dhakate Vs Sharad L. Ahire, Chief Executifve Officer, Zilla Parishad, Bhandara

Rajeshwar S/O Sudhakar Dhakate Vs Shri. P.D. Sohale, Director of Economics and Statistics Planning Deptt.

Rajesh Krupashankar Mishra and Another Vs State of Maharashtra, through Urban Development Department, Mumbai and Others

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur Vs Khalid Nadeem Allarakha

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur- 1 Vs M/S Rachana Construction Co., Nagpur