This is a one-line order dismissing the writ petition. The court noted the lack of proof that a representation was received by the State Government and could not direct a decision. The petition was disposed of with all questions left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
1112wp7440.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.7440 OF 2017
(Mohammad Zahid s/o Mohammad Lukman vs. State of Maharashtra and others)
________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri K. Deogade, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri A.M. Deshpande, Additional Government
Pleader for respondents.
CORAM: R.K. DESHPANDE AND
MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 11, 2019
The question of refund of the amount of
Rs.89,59,232/- on account of petitioner not getting
available access to the sand ghat is involved.
2)It is claimed in the petition that a
representation is made to the State Government, but
there is no statement that the representation is
received by the State Government and
acknowledgment, if any, has also not been
produced. In view of this, we are unable to direct
the State Government to decide the representation
within a stipulated period.
3)If petitioner is entitled to refund of the
aforesaid amount, then it is open for him to make
1112wp7440.17
2/2
an appropriate representation to the State
Government as per policy dated 12/3/2013, if it
continues to exist or any other policy. The State
Government shall process the claim of the petitioner
and take decision in accordance with law. The
petition stands disposed of. All questions are left
open.
JUDGE
JUDGE
khj
Mohammad Zahid
State of Maharashtra
R.K. DESHPANDE
MILIND N. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court