Judgments in land reference cases in respect of land acquired in the vicinity. It has not been brought on record uptill now that the decision in those sister matters or matters relating to the property adjacent to or in the vicinity of the acquired land, in this case, has been modified and brought down by any superior Court. There was no hurdle for the reference Court to consider the rate, that was given in respect of acquisition of the property in the nearby vicinity. As regards the sale instance is concerned, it was also in respect of the property in the vicinity. The sale deed was dated 06.10.1990 i.e. much prior to the date of acquisition of the property in question. Therefore, taking into consideration note of the said sale instance as well as the decision in another reference petition was justified for the learned Trial Court. If we peruse the cross-examination of the claimant conducted on behalf of the respondents/present appellant, it can be seen that except denial and some extraction of the factual situation there is nothing on record. Unless such evidence to disprove the evidence adduced by the claimant is advanced, no different conclusion can be arrived at. The acquisition of the property in question is, land plus constructed portion. Definitely, for constructed portion separate compensation amount was required to be given. Further, as regards loss of business is concerned, it is to be noted that the Special LAO had granted amount of Rs.4,000/- for loss of business, that means the said head is agreeable to the State as well as acquiring body. Now, how much amount
