The High Court of Bombay kept an order absolute by the appellant after depositing the amount involved, pending the final hearing and disposal of the appeal, before discharging the interim application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
920 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5456 OF 2019
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THR ITS MANAGER,PUNE VERSUS
VITHAL YEMAJI KADAM AND ORS
Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Dahat Rohit H And S.S. Patil Advocate for Respondents No.1 and 2 : Mr. Agrawal Pavankumar S.
CORAM : SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. DATE : 18-09-2019.
PER COURT :
(SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI) JUDGE
vjg/-.
Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd., Thr Its Manager, Pune
Vithal Yemaji Kadam
Respondents No.1 and 2 (represented by Mr. Agrawal Pavankumar S.)
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
