The applicant in a civil revision application sought to recover a deposit. The court allowed the request to pay the money to the landlord based on a compromise memo tendered by both parties during the hearing.
The deposit made by the tenant was to be paid to the landlord in view of the compromise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 P-cra-70-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 70 OF 2019
Balchand Khemchand Mutha … Applicant Versus Hassan Ismail Hasan Askari and another … Respondents
Mr. A. N. Sabnis, Advocate h/f Mr. L. D. Vakil, Advocate for applicant. Mr. Amol Gandhi, Advocate h/f Mr. Punit S. Mehta, Advocate for respondent No.1.
CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT, J.
DATED : 13th SEPTEMBER, 2019
PER COURT :-
[ R. G. AVACHAT, J. ]
SMS
1 of 1
Balchand Khemchand Mutha
Hassan Ismail Hasan Askari
R. G. AVACHAT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
