Petitioner approached High Court with a writ petition dismissing the petition due to availability of an efficacious alternate remedy via revision application under the Money Lending Act.
Writ petition disposed of; petitioner directed to approach concerned authority via revision application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2WP4256.18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.4256 OF 2018
KESHARBAI BALASAHEB SONNER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr. A.G.Choudhari, Advocate for petitioner
Mr. S.K.Tambe, AGP for respondents – State
Mr. K.J.Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent no.5
CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 11, 2019
PER COURT :-
Since the petitioner has an equally
efficacious alternate remedy in the nature of Revision
Application under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Money
Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014, he may approach the
concerned authority. The Writ Petition, therefore,
stands disposed of.
2.The petitioner is expected to approach the
concerned authority within a period of four weeks from
today. The competent authority is expected to decide
2 2WP4256.18
the Revision Application, if any, within a period of
eight months therefrom.
3.Till filing of the Revision Application, the
statement made by learned Counsel for respondent no.5
and recorded in the order dated 26.04.2018, to
continue.
kbp
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kesharbai Balasaheb Sonner
The State of Maharashtra
R.G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court