Petitioners sought withdrawal of the contempt petition which the High Court allowed by an oral order on 8 November 2019.
The contempt petition was allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
661.16cp
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 661 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.12271 OF 2015
Arjun s/o Rajaram Hiwale, Age: 40 years, Occ: Service, R/o. Partur, Tq. Partur Dist. Jalna & ors
..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
Smt. Manisha Patankar Mhaiskar, Age: Major, Occ: Service as a Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & ors ..RESPONDENTS
Mr R.R. Khandebharad, Advocate h/f Mr V.D. Salunke, Advocate for petitioners;
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE : 8th NOVEMBER, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, on oral
instructions, prays for withdrawal of the contempt petition. At the request of learned Counsel for the petitioners, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
(ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
Tupe
Arjun s/o Rajaram Hiwale
Smt. Manisha Patankar Mhaiskar
Prasanna B. Varale
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
