The court disposed of a contemnpt petition filed for non-cooperation regarding Gurdwara administration. Respondents provided undertakings to cooperate, leading to the discharge of notices and clarification on expense reimbursement.
The contempt petition is disposed of and notices issued to respondents are discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 55 OF 2018 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 47 OF 2018
GURMIT SINGH., ... Petitioner
Versus
VASUDEV T. HADKONKAR AND 6 ORS., ... Respondents
Mr. Shashikant Narayan Joshi with Ms. S.Bhat, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr. Pravin N. Faldessai, Additional Government Advocate for respondent nos.1 & 2. Mr.Vasudev Hadkankar Inspector General of Societies, District Registrar, South.
Coram:M. S. SONAK & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. Date:25th January 2019
P.C.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties as well as respondent nos.2 to 7, who are present in the Court.
CP/55/2018
2
now appointed and, in any case, they have neither any intention to breach the orders of this Court nor will they breach any orders of the Court. These statements made by them are accepted as undertakings to this Court.
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. M. S. SONAK, J.
mukund
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be disposed of given the undertakings and cooperation from the respondents
Whether the notices issued in the contempt petition should be discharged
Whether the respondent is entitled to reimbursement of reasonable travel expenses for administration
GURMIT SINGH
VASUDEV T. HADKONKAR
M. S. SONAK
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
