Disposed

J. Sundeep Anand and Anr., v. Mukesh Jain.

Bombay HC24 Jan 2019MCA/72/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court extended the time limit for depositing the decretal amount to a specific future date. The applicants were directed to deposit a partial amount by an intermediate deadline, with failure to do so resulting in the vacation of the interim order. A private paper book was also mandated.

What did the court decide?

Extension of time for depositing decretal amount granted; partial deposit directed by specified date.

J. Sundeep Anand and Anr., Vs Mukesh Jain. — Execution and Attachment | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

¶2

MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2019 IN

¶3

STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 3285 OF 2018

¶4

J. SUNDEEP ANAND AND ANR., ... Applicants

Versus

MUKESH JAIN.,

... Respondent

Mr. Jitendra P. Supekar and Mr. S. Sufiyan, Advocates for the Applicants. Mr. Y. Nadkarni, Advocate for the Respondent.

¶9

Coram:M. S. SONAK & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ.

¶10

Date:24th January 2019

¶11

P.C.

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶13

Mr. Superkar, learned counsel for the Applicants states that the time limit for deposit of the decretal amount expired on 23rd January, 2019. He states that despite efforts the Applicants have not been able to arrange to deposit the amount. He states that if leave is granted by 31st January, 2019, the Applicants will positively deposit in this Court an amount of Rs.50,00,000/from out of the decretal amount of Rs.1,20,00,000/-. He points out that even the copies of the demand draft are attached to this application. His statement is accepted. The Applicants to deposit Rs.50,00,000/- by 31st January, 2019.

¶14

MCA/72/2019

¶15

¶16

The time limit for deposit of the balance decretal amount is now extended upto 21st February, 2019. It is made clear that if there is default in depositing the amount of Rs.50,00,000/- by 31st January, 2019 or balance amount by 21st February, 2019, the interim order granted by this Court shall stand vacated without any further reference to this Court.

¶17

Interim order now stands extended upto 21st February, 2019 subject to the aforesaid terms.

¶18

In addition, the Applicants are directed to prepare a private paper book and file the same in this Court within four weeks from today. Once the private paper book is prepared, liberty to the parties to apply for expeditious disposal of the appeal.

¶19

The Misc. Civil Application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶20

All concerned to act on the basis of authenticated copy of this order.

¶21

PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.

¶22

M. S. SONAK, J.

¶23

at*

J. Sundeep Anand and Anr., v. Mukesh Jain.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J. Sundeep Anand and Anr., v. Mukesh Jain.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hanamatarao M. Kulkarni., Vs State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and 2 Ors.

Inacio Dominic Pereira., Vs the State of Goa, Thr. Chief Secretary, Govt. of Goa and 6 Ors.

Kundan Kerkar., Vs State of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary and 4 Ors.

State of Goa, Thr. Incharge of Pernem Police Station, Pernem., Vs Sergius Victor Manka and Anr.

Cicerone Air Transport Services Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Its Director, Joao Xavier Miranda and Anr., Vs Union of India, Thr. Its Ministry of Civil Aviation and Anr.

Karan K., Vs Antonio De Matos Sequeira Almeida.