This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
CP-457.2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.457 OF 2019 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 7122 OF 2018
Vijay Gopinath Barhate. Versus
Petitioner
The State of Maharashtra and others.
Respondents
Mr. Ashraf Patel, Advocate holding for Mr. Abhijeet Avhad, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.P. Sonpawale, A.P.P. for the respondents/State.
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & AVINASH.G. GHAROTE, JJ.
DATE : 13 September 2019.
ORDER :
. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that post filing the petition, the order of this Court wherein the respondent No.3 is directed to release the vehicle of the petitioner, is complied with and the vehicle of the petitioner is released to the petitioner. As such the grievance of the petitioner no more survives.
(AVINASH.G. GHAROTE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
vdd
Vijay Gopinath Barhate
The State of Maharashtra and others
Prasanna B. Varale
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
