Disposed
Gajanan Ramchandra Gedewad and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCCP/309/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 CONT. PETITION NO.309 OF 2019
IN WP/9236/2017
GAJANAN RAMCHANDRA GEDEWAD AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr.Panpatte V.S.
AGP for Respondent No. 1: Mr. K.N. Lokhande
...
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND
ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATED : 3rd DECEMBER, 2019.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Mr. Panpatte, learned counsel for the
petitioners. In response to the notice, the affidavit-
in-reply filed on behalf of respondent No. 2 along with
the copy of the order dated 3.9.2019, whereby approval
is granted to the petitioners and it is also stated in
the order that on compliance of necessary formalities,
the salary would be released in favour of the
petitioners.
2.Mr. Panpatte, learned counsel for the
petitioner has invited our attention to the
2 cp309.19
communication received on 16.2.2019, whereby the
petitioners are praying for withdrawal of the
petition as it is stated in the communication that
an assurance is given by the State Authorities,
namely the Regional Deputy Commissioner of Social
Welfare Department, Latur, to release the salary in
favour of the petitioners on receipt of his salary
bills as early as possible.
3.The petitioners are granted liberty to
withdraw the petition with liberty to take
appropriate steps in the event that in future, if
assurance is not complied with.
4.He made only statement that, it is the
desire of the petitioners to withdraw the petition
and in case the petitioners submit the proceedings
before the Competent Forums including this Court,
needless to state that proceedings would be decided
on its own merits.
5.Petition is disposed of with above referred
3
cp309.19
observations.
(ANIL S. KILOR) (PRASANNA B. VARALE)
JUDGEJUDGE
mahajansb/
GAJANAN RAMCHANDRA GEDEWAD AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
PRASANNA B. VARALE
ANIL S. KILOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court