Dismissed

Ajit Uttamrao Wagh v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC2 Dec 2019CP/195/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition filed for non-compliance of a court order directing payment. Petitioner admitted receipt of the awarded amount in written communication, extinguishing the grievance. Court disposed of the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as the petitioner admitted receipt of the awarded amount, and the grievance no longer survives.

Ajit Uttamrao Wagh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others — Contempt of Court | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

195.18cp

¶2

( 1 )

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 195 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9501 OF 2016

¶5

Dr.Ajit Uttamrao Wagh Age 66 Years, Occu.Pensioner R/o 18, Sahyadri, Draupadi Nagar, Dist.Jalgaon

¶6

PETITIONER

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, Education Department Mantralaya Mumbai-32

¶9

The North Maharashtra University Jalgaon at Jalgaon Through its Registrar

¶10

Public Education Society Valvadi Shivar, Dhule Through its Chairman/Secretary Shri Adv.Sahebrao Vitthal Bhamre Age Major, Occu.Agri Goundur Road, Tq.& Dist.Dhule

¶11

Arts, Science and Commerce College, Valvadi, Dhule Through its Principal Pro.Kalyan More Age: Major, Occu-Service Goundur Road, Tq.& Dist.Dhule

¶12

Ishwar Shinde

¶13

( 2 ) 195.18cp

¶14

The Administrative Officer Public Education Society, Valvadi Shivar, Dhule RESPONDENTS

¶15

Mr Tushar Daware, h/f Mr A.G.Talhar, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for respondent/State Mr N.L. Choudhari, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 & 4;

¶16

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

¶17

DATED : 2nd DECEMBER, 2019

¶18

ORAL ORDER:

¶19

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4.

¶20

On a grievance of non-compliance of the order of this Court dated 4th December, 2017, whereby respondents were directed to make payment of Rs. 6,50,000/- to the petitioner with stipulated period was not complied with, present contempt petition was filed. Notice was issued. Various orders were passed by this Court. On 21st November, 2019, a cheque bearing No.000269, dated 27th

¶21

November, 2019 drawn on ICICI Bank for Rs.3,50,000/- in favour of the petitioner was handed over to the learned Counsel for the petitioner.

¶22

Today, learned Counsel appearing for respondents placed on record a written communication to the president of Public Education Society, Dhule dated 1st December, 2019, whereby the petitioner admits the receipt of Rs. 3,50,000/- on 1st December, 2019 and it is admitted by the petitioner that entire amount as directed by this Court is now received by the petitioner and grievance of the petitioner no more survives. Learned Counsel for the petitioner admits this position.

¶23

As grievance of the petitioner no more survives, the petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶24

[ANIL S. KILOR, J.] [PRASANNA B. VARALE,J.]

¶25

Tupe

Ajit Uttamrao Wagh v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajit Uttamrao Wagh v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kautik Namdeo Dandge Vs Sudhakar S Vyavahare and Others

Rajendra Dhansign Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sapan Sushilkumar Zunzunwala and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ramchandra Sukharam Meher Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Mahesh Suryakant Tapse Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sudhakar Dnyanoba Shinde and Others Vs the Union of India through Its Secretary Ministry of Agriculture Corp and Farmers Welfare and Ors.