Dismissed

Anil Ramchandra Chimote v. the State of Maha. Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Co-Op. Marketing and Textile Dept. and Others

Bombay HC18 Sept 2019CP/259/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court held that since the underlying writ petition regarding money lending transactions was already decided, the question of contempt does not arise. The relief claims dependent on personal grievance were not touched. The contempt petition was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition is dismissed as the underlying writ petition was already decided.

Anil Ramchandra Chimote Vs the State of Maha. Thr… — Contempt of Court | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

1 909.CP259.19.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.259/2019

¶4

Mr. A. R. Chimote vs. State of Maharashtra & ors.

¶5

.............................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

............................................................................................................................................ Shri. R. M. Padhye, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri. A. M. Deshpande, Additional Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶7

CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 18^th September, 2019

¶8

In Writ Petition No. 3175 of 2015 alongwith connected matters decided on 07-08-2015, the Court has recorded its decision about the concerns which were expressed by the petitioners in money lending transactions. In view of this, the question of looking into contempt alleged in the petition, does not arise.

¶9

The relief claims in the contempt petition in terms of Clauses 3 and 7 can be claimed by the petitioner, if he is personally aggrieved by any such decision. Hence, we do not touch those aspects to keep it open to be agitated in appropriate proceeding.

¶10

The petition is dismissed.

¶11

JUDGEJUDGE

¶12

RGurnule

Anil Ramchandra Chimote v. the State of Maha. Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Co-Op. Marketing and Textile Dept. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Ramchandra Chimote v. the State of Maha. Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Co-Op. Marketing and Textile Dept. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dattu S/O Damodhar Sawarbandhe and Others Vs State of Maharashtra through the Collector, Bhandara and Others

Narendra S/O Ramdas Khandare and Others Vs State Bank of India Officers Association, Mumbai through General Secretary and Others

M/S Shree Om Enterprises, Nagpur Thr. Its Prop. Marotrao Rajaram Motghare Vs Chairman, Appellate Auth., Mumbai Thr. Principal/Additional Chief Sec., Environment Dept., and Anr.

Smt. Kalapana W/O Vishwasrao Khandare Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary, Forest and Revenue Department, Mumbai and Other

Bebinanda Ramkrushna Sirsat Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Education and Sports Department, Mumbaia and 2 Others

Farhana Talat Shahzad Khan Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Education and Sports Department, Mumbai and 2 Others