Allowed

Madhusudan S/O. Shriram Pilley v. Union of India, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Thr. Its Secretary and Others

Bombay HC8 Nov 2019CAW/706/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the civil application extending the timeline for the original petitioner to decide his caste claim by 12 months. It also directed that protection regarding the petitioner's termination of services continues until the Scrutiny Committee makes a decision.

What did the court decide?

Extension of time to decide caste claim by 12 months; protection against service termination until Scrutiny Committee decision.

Madhusudan S/O. Shriram Pilley Vs Union of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 706 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3555 OF 2015

¶4

Madhusudan S/o Shriram Pilley

¶5

vs.
Union of India and others

¶6

..............................................................................................................................................
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order
of directions and Registrar's orders

¶7

Shri A.M.Chaudhari, Advocate holding for Shri
R.S.Parsodkar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri A.M. Joshi, AGP for applicant/respondent no.5.

¶8

CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE &
 MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATED: 08th NOVEMBER, 2019

¶9

For the reasons stated in the application, the
application is allowed. Time to decide the caste claim of the
original petitioner is extended by further period of 12
months.

¶10

Needless to say that protection granted for
termination of the services of the petitioner shall continue to
operate till the decision of the Scrutiny Committee.

¶11

Civil Application stands disposed of.

¶12

JUDGE JUDGE

¶13

Ambulkar

¶14

Digitally signed by Mukund Ambulkar Date: 2019.11.08 18:06:49 +0530

¶15

Mukund Ambulkar

¶16

Madhusudan S/O. Shriram Pilley v. Union of India, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Thr. Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhusudan S/O. Shriram Pilley v. Union of India, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Thr. Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Ajaj Qureshi S/O Abdul Wab Qureshi Vs Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Home and Affairs, New Delhi and Others

Anilkumar Waktuji Thaware Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Dept. of Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and or

Bhandara Zilla Sahakari Krishi Audyogik Sangh Ltd. Bhandara Thr. Manager Shri Bharat Gyaniram Thakr Vs the Maha. State Co-Op. Marketing Federation Ltd. Bhandara Thr. District Marketing Officer and Anoth

Dr. Surendra Kumar Ajabrao Bhuyar Vs Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur, Thr. Member Secretary and Others

Dr. Surendra S/O Digamber Suryawanshi Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mumbai and 4 Others

Mr. Sujit S/O Devidasji Thamke Vs Union of India, through Its Secretary, Dept. of Electronic and Informration Technology, New Delhi