Disposed

Mr. Sujit S/O Devidasji Thamke v. Union of India, through Its Secretary, Dept. of Electronic and Informration Technology, New Delhi

Bombay HC8 Nov 2019CAW/2836/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An order correcting a clerical mistake in an earlier order regarding the name of counsel appearing for the respondent. The application is subsequently disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to substitute the name of Shri M.G.Burde in the order dated 11.09.2018; the civil application is disposed of.

What the court decided

Mr. Sujit S/O Devidasji Thamke Vs Union of India, through Its Secretary, Dept. of Electronic and Informration Technology, New Delhi — Bombay HC (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

CAW NO.2836/2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2855 OF 2018

¶4

Shri Sujit Devidasji Thamke

¶5

vs.
Union of India and ors.

¶6

..............................................................................................................................................
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order
of directions and Registrar's orders

¶7

..............................................................................................................................................
Shri A.V.Lokhande, Advocate for the applicant.

¶8

CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE &

¶9

 MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATED: 08th NOVEMBER, 2019

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner accepts that
on the date when the matter was decided on 11.09.2018
Shri M.G.Burde, Advocate appeared along with Shri
D.M.Burde, Advocate and Shri C.J.Dhumane, Advocate did
not appear. It seems that there is some mistake and,
therefore, we permit to substitute the name of Shri
M.G.Burde Advocate to be added as the learned counsel
appearing for the respondents instead of Shri C.J. Dhumane,
Advocate in the order dated 11.09.2018 passed by this
Court.

¶11

Civil Application stands disposed of.

¶12

JUDGE JUDGE

¶13

Ambulkar

¶14

Digitally signed by Mukund Mukund Ambulkar Ambulkar Date: 2019.11.08 18:08:14 +0530

Mr. Sujit S/O Devidasji Thamke v. Union of India, through Its Secretary, Dept. of Electronic and Informration Technology, New Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Mr. Sujit S/O Devidasji Thamke v. Union of India, through Its Secretary, Dept. of Electronic and Informration Technology, New Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Ajaj Qureshi S/O Abdul Wab Qureshi Vs Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Home and Affairs, New Delhi and Others

Anilkumar Waktuji Thaware Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Dept. of Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and or

Bhandara Zilla Sahakari Krishi Audyogik Sangh Ltd. Bhandara Thr. Manager Shri Bharat Gyaniram Thakr Vs the Maha. State Co-Op. Marketing Federation Ltd. Bhandara Thr. District Marketing Officer and Anoth

Dr. Surendra Kumar Ajabrao Bhuyar Vs Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur, Thr. Member Secretary and Others

Dr. Surendra S/O Digamber Suryawanshi Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mumbai and 4 Others

Madhusudan S/O. Shriram Pilley Vs Union of India, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Thr. Its Secretary and Others