The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) treated this application as infructuous because the petitioner's underlying claim had already been decided by a prior order.
The Civil Application was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
0706caw630.19
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLICATION [W] NO. 630/2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1064/2016.
Umakant Madhukar Suryawanshi
The State of Maharashtra and others
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Shri S.P. Deshpande, Addl.G.P. for Applicant/Respondent No.5.
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 07, 2019.
Heard.
decided, hence, Civil Application for extension of time
has become infructuous. The same is disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
Umakant Madhukar Suryawanshi
The State of Maharashtra
R.K. DESHPANDE
VINAY JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
