The High Court dismissed a Civil Application filed by the State seeking extension of time to comply with previous directions, holding that the delay was so long that nothing survived. The application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(40)CAWNo.5242019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.524 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10210 OF 2010
The State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, Co-operation Department & Ors.
... Applicants
V/s. Arun Nathuram Gaikwad & Ors. ... Respondents
Mrs.S.S.Bhende, AGP for the Applicants/State.
CORAM : INDRAJIT MAHANTY & A.M.BADAR JJ.
DATED : 18th MARCH 2019.
P.C. :
1 This is an application filed by the State seeking extension of time to comply with the directions of this Court dated 22nd November 2011. The period as long since elapsed, nothing survives in this Civil Application.
2 Hence, the application shall stands dismissed.
(A.M.BADAR, J.) (INDRAJIT MAHANTY, J.)
1/1
Gaikwad RD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Civil Application filed by State to extend time to comply with directions remains valid after an unreasonable lapse of time.
The State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, Co-operation Department & Ors.
Arun Nathuram Gaikwad & Ors.
Indrajit Mahanty
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
