Disposed

Ratnagiri Vibag S.T. Kamchari Sahakari Pathsanstha Maryadit , Ratnagiri v. Maharashtra State Transport Corporation and Ors.

Bombay HC15 Mar 2019WP/10989/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This batch of writ petitions challenging a State Road Transport Corporation circular was disposed of because a subsequent circular cancelled the impugned notification and permitted the earlier practice subject to conditions. No issue remains for consideration.

What did the court decide?

All Writ Petitions disposed off as the impugned notification is no longer in force.

Ratnagiri Vibag S.T. Kamchari Sahakari Pathsanstha… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

(17)WP-11163-17.doc

¶2

rkmore

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.11163 OF 2017

¶6

State Transport Employees Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. ] ..Petitioner.

¶7

¶8

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ]..Respondents.

¶9

WITH

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO.10986 OF 2017

¶11

State Transport Employees Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. ] ..Petitioner.

¶12

¶13

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation & Ors. ]..Respondents.

¶14

WITH

¶15

WRIT PETITION NO.10987 OF 2017

¶16

State Transport Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. ] ..Petitioner. v.

¶17

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation & Ors. ]..Respondents.

¶18

WITH

¶19

WRIT PETITION NO.10989 OF 2017

¶20

Ratnagiri Vibag S.T. Karmachari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit, Ratnagiri ] ..Petitioner.

¶21

¶22

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation & Ors. ]..Respondents. WITH

¶23

WRIT PETITION NO.10990 OF 2017 S.T.Kamgar Sahakari Sanstha Ltd., Sangli ] ..Petitioner.

¶24

¶25

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation & Ors. ]..Respondents.

1/3

(17)WP-11163-17.doc

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.10993 OF 2017

¶30

Maharashtra Rajya Parivahan Mahamandal ] ..Petitioner. Sevakanchi Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd.

¶31

¶32

The Financial Adviser & Chief Accounts Officer & Ors. ]..Respondents.

¶33

WITH

¶34

WRIT PETITION NO.11045 OF 2017

¶35

Maharashtra S.T. Kamgar Sahakari Pat Sanstha ] Maryadit Chandgad ] ..Petitioner. v. Maharashtra State Transport Corporation & Ors. ]..Respondents.

¶36

Mr.R.S.Ghadge i/by A.S. Desai for the Petitioner. Mr.Yashodeep Deshmukh, for the Respondent-MSRTC. Mr. Gopal K.S. Hegde alongwith C.M.Lokesh and Ms.P.M. Bansal for CIDCO. Mr.A.P.Vanarase, AGP for the State.

¶37

CORAM : INDRAJIT MAHANTY & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 15^th MARCH, 2019.

¶38

P.C.

¶39

1] Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.

¶40

2] Challenge in the batch of these Writ Petitions has been made to a circular issued by the State Road Transport Corporation under Exhibit B

¶41

2/3

¶42

(17)WP-11163-17.doc

¶43

dated 16^th September, 2017 on page 19. Mr.Deshmukh, learned counsel appearing for the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation today bring to our notice a subsequent circular dated 8/9^th February, 2018. In terms of this circular, all earlier circulars including the circular at Exhibit B as noted hereinabove have been cancelled and or withdrawn, and a fresh guideline has been issued, permitting the employees to obtain loans from Cooperative Credit Society and also indicating to consider the earlier practice of permitting dues of members who have sought for loans from Credit Society and to remit their dues directly to the Credit Society, subject to conditions imposed in the said circular.

¶44

3] In view of aforesaid situation, the impugned notification dated 16^th September, 2017 under Exhibit B no longer survives. Accordingly, all these Writ Petitions stand disposed off as nothing remains for consideration. However, we make it clear that , if any other Petitioner/s is/are aggrieved by the fresh circular, they are at liberty to challenge the same on any such ground that may be advised.

¶45

4] In all the connected matters, the impugned notification is filed at different exhibit numbers and on different pages. The impugned notification is no longer in force in view of the subsequent notification, as stated hereinabove.

¶46

(A.M. BADAR, J) (INDRAJIT MAHANTY, J)

¶47

3/3

Ratnagiri Vibag S.T. Kamchari Sahakari Pathsanstha Maryadit , Ratnagiri v. Maharashtra State Transport Corporation and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ratnagiri Vibag S.T. Kamchari Sahakari Pathsanstha Maryadit , Ratnagiri v. Maharashtra State Transport Corporation and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Maharasthra Vs Khanderao Narayan Jaibhane

Jawed Ramjan Tamboli Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Juhu Co-Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. and Members Vs District Co-Op. Election Auth. Mumbai and Ors.

Maharashtra S.T. Kamgar Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit Chandgad Vs Maharashtra State Transport Corporation and Ors.

State Transport Employees Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. Vs Maharashtra State Transport Corporation and Ors.

Maharashtra S.T. Kamgar Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit Chandgad Vs Maharashtra State Transport Corporation and Ors.