The High Court at Nagpur dismissed a writ petition as the petitioner did not wish to press the amendment application. No further orders were required.
Dismissal of the application for amendment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 918.WP5608.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.2181/2019
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5608/2019
Sadashiv Sattidin Gupta
vs.
The Chairman – Managing Director, WCL, Nagpur and ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order
of directions and Registrar's orders
Shri. S.S. Gupta – In-Person.
Shri. A. M. Chare, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM: R.K. DESHPANDE &
VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
DATED: 20th September, 2019
The matter is already admitted. There is no
application for grant of early hearing or grant of interim
relief.
The petitioner does not want to press the
application for amendment and therefore, it is
dismissed as such. No further orders are required to be
passed.
JUDGE
JUDGE
RGurnule
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking amendment needs to be allowed or dismissed.
Sadashiv Sattidin Gupta
The Chairman – Managing Director, WCL, Nagpur
The Chairman – Managing Director, WCL, Nagpur
The Chairman – Managing Director, WCL, Nagpur and ors.
R.K. DESHPANDE
VINAY JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court