The Second Appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution by a single judge. The accompanying Civil Application was disposed of as no longer survived the dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 185 OF 2013
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 763 OF 2013
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 185 OF 2013
Dnyanu Manu Patole..Appellant
vs.
Umaji Manu Patole (deceased)
through heirs & ors...Respondents
None for appellant.
Shri M.M. Sathaye for respondent Nos.1A, 2 to 4.
Shri Shambhuraje Pisal h/f. Shri Dhananjay Rananaware for
respondent No.5.
CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J.
DATE : 16th OCTOBER, 2019
P.C. :
None for the appellant.
2.Considering the earlier orders passed by this Court it
appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this
Appeal, the Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3.In view of the dismissal of the Appeal, nothing
survives for consideration in the Civil Application. The Civil
Application is disposed of.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.)
1/1
Digitally signed Diksha by Diksha RaneDate: Rane 2019.10.1710:59:53 +0530
Dnyanu Manu Patole
Umaji Manu Patole
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court