Dismissed
White Feather Films and Anr. v. Pritish Nandy Communication Limited
Bombay HCCARBP/66/2016
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
carbp66-16.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.66 OF 2016
White Feather Films And Anr. ...Petitioners
vs Pritish Nandy Communication Limited ...Respondent
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. Shakeeb Shaikh, a/w. Mr. A. Diamondwala, i/b. Diamondwala & Co., for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
DATED: 6 MARCH, 2019
P.C. :
. None for the Petitioners. On 30 January 2019, none had appeared for the Petitioners and the matter was stood over as a last chance to 12 February 2019. On 12 February 2019, though Counsel appeared on behalf of the Petitioners, a request was made for adjournment. The petition was adjourned to 27 February 2019. It was made clear that no further adjournment would be granted. Today, when the matter is called out, none appears for the Petitioners. In the premises, the arbitration petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
( S.C. GUPTE, J. )
Pg 1 of 1
White Feather Films And Anr.
Pritish Nandy Communication Limited
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court