Disposed
Smithaa Deepak Parekh v. Hasmukh N Desai and 24 Ors.
Bombay HCARBP/70/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
70-2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
arbp 70-2016.doc
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 70 OF 2016
Smithaa Deepak Parekh …Petitioner vs Hasmukh N. Desai & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Tushar Bhavsar I/b. Avinash N. Joshi for Petitioner. Mr.Sanjay S. Gawde for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.Rashid Khan I/b. Manoj Bhatt for Respondent Nos.3 to 24.
CORAM : S.C.GUPTE, J.
DATE : 5 MARCH 2019
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the parties tender consent terms between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 duly signed by the parties for themselves or through their constituted attorney/authorised representative and their respective Advocates. Learned Counsel seek disposal of the petition in terms of the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record, marked “X” for identification. The statements and undertakings contained therein are accepted. The petition is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. No order as to costs.
2 It is clarified that the arbitration reference provided for in para 10 of the consent terms shall be only as between the Petitioner, on the one hand, and Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3, on the other.
(S.C. GUPTE, J.)
Smithaa Deepak Parekh
Hasmukh N. Desai & Ors.
S.C. GUPTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court