The High Court of Bombay considered a civil application where the respondent failed to appear despite service. The court condoned an 184-day delay and disposed of the application ex parte.
Disposed of the civil application after condoning a delay of 184 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 1 23-CAM-39-18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.39 OF 2018 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO.1079 OF 2018
Pravin Sakharam Pawar .... Applicant versus Mrs.Varsha Pravin Pawar ... Respondent
CORAM : INDRAJIT MAHANTY & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : 08th MARCH, 2019.
P.C. :
No.1, none has entered appearance for the Respondent. Accordingly, considering submissions advanced in the application, the delay of 184 days stands condoned.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(INDRAJIT MAHANTY, J.)
Nesarikar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 184 days in filing the application can be condoned.
Pravin Sakharam Pawar
Mrs.Varsha Pravin Pawar
SARANG V. KOTWAL
INDRAJIT MAHANTY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
