In a family court appeal matter, the division bench disposed of cases where service was awaited or the civil application was not pressed. The specific civil application was dismissed for want of pressure, and the main matter was listed for a future date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10FCAST2046518.odt
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO.20465 OF 2018
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.20467 OF 2018 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO.20465 OF 2018
Mrutyunjay Bhalchandra Kalyani .... Appellant/ Applicant versus Mrs.Smita Mrutyunjay Kalyani ... Respondent
CORAM : INDRAJIT MAHANTY & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : 08th MARCH, 2019.
P.C. :
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(INDRAJIT MAHANTY, J.)
Nesarikar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Civil Application No.20467 of 2018 is maintainable when not pressed by the respondent.
Mrutyunjay Bhalchandra Kalyani
Mrs. Smita Mrutyunjay Kalyani
INDRAJIT MAHANTY
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
