Disposed
Scintillating Imports Inc. v. Barclays Bank London and Ors.
Bombay HCCAA/466/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15 CAA 466 OF 2017
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.466 OF 2017 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO.25051 OF 2016
Scintillating Imports Inc. … Applicant. V/s. Barclays Bank London and ors … Respondents
Mr. Vaibhav Sugdare a/w Mr. Ishwar Athiya i/by Thakordas Madgaonkar, for the applicant. Ms. Sarrah Khambata i/by Wadia Ghandy & Co., for respondent No.1.
CORAM : DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.
DATE : 5th FEBRUARY, 2019.
P.C. :
2] This application is for condonation of delay of 2 days in filing this Appeal from order.
2] For the reasons stated in the application as sufficient cause is made out, the delay is condoned. Application is allowed with no order as to costs.
[DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a cause has been made out for condoning a delay of two days in filing the civil application.
Scintillating Imports Inc.
Barclays Bank London
Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court