Appeal against the rejection of a Notice of Motion was disposed of as withdrawn, with the Trial Court suit's hearing expedited by consent.
The Appeal stands disposed off as withdrawn. The hearing of the Suit is expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dixit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.351 OF 2016
Amarpratik Builders Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai .… Appellant V/s. Siddharth Dilipkumar Shah & Ors. …. Respondents
Mr. Ashish Raghuvanshi, I/by Mr. Ram Ugrah Singh, for the Appellant. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J. DATE : 4 TH FEBRUARY, 2019.
P.C. :
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]
1/1
AO-351-16.doc
Amarpratik Builders Pvt. Ltd.
Siddharth Dilipkumar Shah
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
