In a civil application arising from a writ petition, the High Court disposed of the matter and discharged the rule because a prior rule had been issued by another judge, acknowledging subsequent deaths of a party and their legal representatives.
Rule is discharged. Application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3899 OF 2002 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1764 OF 2002
Mr.N.R.Solunke and Mr.V.D.Salunke, Advocates for the applicants. Mr.S.R.Yadav, AGP for respondent Nos. 1, 4 and 5. Mr.B.V.Dhage, Advocate for LR's of respondent.
( CORAM : Ravindra V.Ghuge, J.)
DATE : 25/01/2019
PER COURT :
( Ravindra V.Ghuge, J.)
khs/JAN.2019/3899-d
Mr. N.R. Solunke
Mr. V.D. Salunke
Respondents 1, 4 and 5
LRs of Respondent
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
