Writ petition disposed of by granting the respondent Additional General Public Prosecutor liberty to file a second revision, noting the petitioner has a statutory remedy under the cited judicial pronouncement.
Liberty to prefer a second revision within four weeks; time spent in Court considered for condonation of delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
910 WRIT PETITION NO.11412 OF 2018
ROHIDAS DALSINGH JADHAV VERSUS BANDU DALSINGH JADHAV AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Shri Jadhav Kiran D. AGP for Respondent 3 : Shri Yadav (Lonikar) S.R.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. Dated: January 24, 2019 ...
PER COURT :-
akl/d
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
2- WRIT PETITION NO.11412 OF 2018
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
akl/d
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted liberty to prefer a second revision instead of the writ petition being dismissed?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani vs. State of Maharashtra and othersReferred¶9
Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani vs. State of Maharashtra and others [2016 (2) SCC 213] · Who else cites this
ROHIDAS DALSINGH JADHAV
AND ANOTHER
STATE
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
