The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed a civil application to correct the address of respondent No. 2 in an underlying writ petition regarding a formal clerical amendment.
The application to correct the respondent's address was allowed in terms of prayer clause (B); necessary amendment to be carried out forthwith.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2588.19ca
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2588 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2017 OF 2019
Sanjay s/o Pandurang Bhangade & ors ..APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors
..RESPONDENTS
Mr Suryakant S. Pawar, Advocate for applicants;
Mr S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for respondent/State
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE
AND
S.M.GAVHANE, JJ.
DATE : 21st FEBRUARY, 2019
ORAL ORDER :
By way of present application, the
applicants are praying for correction of address of
respondent No.2 mentioned in the title clause of
the petition.
2.This being a formal prayer and for the
reasons stated in the application, the application
is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).
2588.19ca
(2)
3.Necessary amendment/correction be carried
out forthwith.
( S.M.GAVHANE )(PRASANNA B. VARALE)
JUDGE JUDGE
Tupe
Sanjay s/o Pandurang Bhangade & ors
The State of Maharashtra & ors
Prasanna B. Varale
S.M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court