This oral order allowed the withdrawal of a writ petition filed by a petitioner against the State of Maharashtra dealing with rural development matters. The accompanying civil application was also disposed of as a consequence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
997.19wp
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.997 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2510 OF 2019
Bhartibai Pandurang Sudewad, @ Bharatibai Deelip Bastewad, Age: 43 years, Occu: Household/ Sarpanch of Grampanchayat, Tamsa, R/o: Tamsa, Taluka Hadgaon, District Nanded
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra, Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr S. S. Gangakhedkar, Advocate for petitioner; Ms R. P. Gour, A.G.P. for respondents
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND S. M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATE : 21st February, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions, prays for withdrawal of the petition. The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn.
(S. M. GAVHANE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
sjk
Bhartibai Pandurang Sudewad
The State of Maharashtra
Prasanna B. Varale
S. M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
