Allowed

Kunal Vilas Bhosale v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC9 Jan 2019BA/54/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Bail Application No. 54 of 2019, the Bombay High Court allowed the bail application of the applicant convicted in Crime No. 210 of 2018, subject to executing a bond and complying with specific conditions regarding evidence tampering, witness influence, and periodic attendance with the investigating officer despite prior antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail via PR bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties; conditions on evidence tampering, witness influence, and Saturday attendance.

Kunal Vilas Bhosale Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

1/3 Yadav 914.ba.54.2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 54 of 2019

¶4

Kunal Vilas Bhosale … Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶5

Mr. Ghansham S. Jadhav for Applicant.

¶6

Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for Respondent – State.

¶7

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE : JANUARY 9, 2019.

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

. In Crime No. 210 of 2018 the Applicant is already chargesheeted for an offence punishable under Sections 399 & 402 of the Indian Penal Code. The Applicant is arrest on 24^th August 2018.

¶10

The trial court has rejected the Application on the ground that there are four antecedents, details of which are as under :-

¶11

(a) Crime No. 546 of 2017 punishable under Sections 143, 147, 149,

¶12

324 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

2/3 Yadav 914.ba.54.2019

¶14

(b) Crime No. 619 of 2017 punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 324, 323, 504, 506, 427 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

¶16

(d) Crime No. 246 of 2018 punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

The learned APP while opposing the bail before this Court relied upon such antecedents. It is not in dispute that in Crime No. 246 of 2018 in Bail Application No. 718 of 2018 the learned Sessions Judge has ordered release of the present Applicant along with other co-accused in the same crime, who are common in the present crime also. In the said Crime No. 246 of 2018 the offence is punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. So far as the other offences are concerned, the same are punishable under Sections 324, 326, 427, 354 etc. of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

In view of above, in my opinion, the Applicant also deserves to be released on the following conditions :-

¶19

3/3 Yadav 914.ba.54.2019

¶20

(A) In Crime No. 210 of 2018 punishable under Sections 399 & 402 of the Indian Penal Code, the Applicant be released on bail on executing PR bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the like amount.

¶21

(B) The Applicant shall neither tamper the evidence of prosecution nor influence the prosecution witnesses.

¶22

¶23

(D) If it is noticed that the Applicant indulged in any other offence other than the five offences including the one, Prosecution is at liberty to move the Sessions Court for cancellation of bail.

¶24

Criminal Application stands allowed in above terms.

¶25

(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

Kunal Vilas Bhosale v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kunal Vilas Bhosale v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dipak Babasaheb Thakare and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Jyoti Anand Pungar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Tukaram Maruti Kale Vs the State of Maharashtra

Deepak Achyut Bandekar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Devendra Laxman Kaparti Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ravi Kisanrao Kulkarni Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.