Tukaram Maruti Kale v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
ISM IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What did the court decide?
Application withdrawn; applicant granted one week to surrender.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ISM
1 910.30.19 aba.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 30 OF 2019
Tukaram Maruti Kale .....Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent
Mr. Sandesh Patil i/b Mr. Prithviraj S. Gole advocate for the applicant
Mr. N. B. Patil APP for the State
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : JANUARY 8, 2019.
P.C.
The learned counsel for the applicant after arguing for some time, on instructions makes a motion for withdrawal of the application.
2 Application stands dismissed as withdrawn. Applicant is granted one week's time to surrender as prayed by him.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
Tukaram Maruti Kale
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court