Shubham Chandrakant Khetale v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant appeared without representation. The bail application was dismissed for want of prosecution as none appeared on the date of hearing.
The applicant appeared without representation. The bail application was dismissed for want of prosecution as none appeared on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ba.3397.18.23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3397 OF 2018
Shubham Chandrakant Khetale ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
None for the Applicant
Ms. Veera Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. THURSDAY, 18 th JULY 2019
P.C. :
1 None appeared for the applicant on 4th July 2019,
pursuant to which, the matter was adjourned to 18th July 2019. Even
today, none appears for the applicant.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
1/1
SQ Pathan
Shubham Chandrakant Khetale
The State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court