Allowed

Annubai @ Anusaya Gundu Mandekar and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC3 Dec 2019BA/3354/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail application filed by four female applicants accused of murder and assault in connection with a property dispute. The court noted their gender and the relatively lesser role ascribed to them compared to other accused persons.

What did the court decide?

Respite on bail with P.R. bond of Rs. 20,000 each with sureties, subject to appearing once a month at the police station.

Annubai @ Anusaya Gundu Mandekar and Ors. Vs the State of… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2019)

1 of 3

Sajakali Jamadar

915-ba-3354-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3354 OF 2019

¶6

Annubai @ Anusaya Gundu Mandekar

¶7

Anu@ Shantabai Mahadev Mandekar

¶8

Anita Mahadev Mandekar

¶9

@ Anita Vishwas Tendulkar

¶10

Surekha Mahadev Mandekar ...Applicants

¶11

Versus

¶12

The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶13

Mr. Tejas Hilage, Advocate for the Applicants.

¶14

Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the State-Respondent.

¶15

CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 3^rd December, 2019

¶16

PC :

¶17

The applicants are apprehending arrest in C.R. No. 144 of 2019 registered with Ajara Police Station, Kolhapur for offences punishable under Section 302, 143, 147, 148, 149 & 504 of IPC.

¶18

The case of the prosecution is that the informant is the wife of the deceased Jagannath Gundu Mandekar. There was dispute on account of landed property of the cousins Gundu Mandekar and Mahadev Mandekar. The disputes were related to the partition of the property. It is alleged that on 2^nd November, 2019 at about 11.30 a.m. the husband was accosted by accused Mahadev Mandekar and

¶19

2 of 3 915-ba-3354-19.doc

¶20

Sajakali Jamadar

¶21

Pundlik Mandekar assaulted him by Axe. Gundu Mandekar and others assaulted by fist and kicks blows. It is alleged that the applicants had also participated in the crime and had abused and assaulted the deceased by fist and kick blows.

¶22

The applicants are in custody from 3^rd November, 2019. The applicants are ladies. The role ascribed to them is abuses and assault by fist and kick blows. Balu Mandekar and Sachin Mandekar were granted Anticipatory Bail on the ground of alibi. In view of the role assigned to the applicant and also considering the fact that they are ladies and in custody from 3^rd November, 2019, bail can be granted to them.

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

i) Bail Application No. 3354 of 2019 is allowed; ii) The applicants are directed to be released on bail in connection with C.R. No. 144 of 2019 registered with Ajara Police Station, Kolhapur on their furnishing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- each with one or more sureties in the like amount;

¶25

iii) The applicants shall report concerned police station once in a month on every first Saturday

Sajakali Jamadar

915-ba-3354-19.doc

3 of 3

between 10.00 am. to 12.00 pm. till further order.

¶30

iv) Bail Application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶31

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

Annubai @ Anusaya Gundu Mandekar and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Annubai @ Anusaya Gundu Mandekar and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anjali Ravindra Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rohit Rajendra Koli Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mayur Mahadev Salukhe Vs the State of Maharashtra

Balu Gundu Mandekar and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rohan Pradiprao Mahalangikar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Jivaji Ramchandra Salunkhe Vs the State of Maharashtra