In a bail application, the applicant withdrew the plea citing his studies and youth. The court permitted withdrawal and directed the trial court to expedite the trial to complete it within one year.
Application for bail allowed to be withdrawn; trial expedited to be completed within one year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 of 1
Sajakali Jamadar
9-BA-1362-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1362 OF 2019
Rohan Pradiprao Mahalangikar
...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
Mr. Aniket Nikam i/b Vivek N. Arote, Advocate for the Applicant.
Smt. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State-Respondent.
CORAM :PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE : 3rd December, 2019
PC :
1.After arguing the matter and since the Court was not inclined
to grant bail. Learned counsel for the applicant on instructions
sought permission to withdraw this application. However, it is
submitted that the applicant was studying in Civil Engineering, and
at the time of incident he was aged about 18 years. He is in custody
from 13th March, 2018. Hence, it is prayed that the trial may be
expedited. Considering the aforesaid circumstances application is
allowed to be withdrawn. Trial is expedited. The trial Court shall
make an endeavor to complete the trial within one year from today.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rohan Pradiprao Mahalangikar
The State of Maharashtra
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court