High Court dismissed the bail application of an applicant charged with offences under IPC sections 326 and 307, holding that FIR and seizure of weapon made sufficient prima facie inference of involvement for bail refusal.
Application for regular bail rejected; no case for bail made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 8) ba23-19.doc
SAS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.23 OF 2019
Jyotiram @ Ashok Saudagar Kshirsagar ..Applicant. V/s.
State of Maharashtra
..Respondent.
Mr.Ritesh Thobde for the applicant.
Smt.Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the respondent-State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : JANUARY 28, 2019
P.C.:-
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State.
2 8) ba23-19.doc
daughter of the applicant recorded under section 164 of Criminal Procedure Code and seizure of blood stained weapon from the spot, it is sufficient to infer the involvement of the applicant in the crime for an offence punishable under section 307 of the Indian
Penal Code.
( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a case for regular bail is made out for the applicant charged under sections 326 and 307 IPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jyotiram @ Ashok Saudagar Kshirsagar
State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
