Allowed

Dinesh Vasant Kamble v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC28 Jan 2019ABA/238/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This anticipatory bail application was granted where the court held that the plain reading of the First Information Report did not support the prosecution's theory due to implied consent and a continuing physical relationship.

What did the court decide?

The applicant shall be released on executing a PR bond of Rs.25,000/- with sureties complying with specific reporting and restrictions conditions.

Dinesh Vasant Kamble Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

1/3 Yadav 26.aba.238.19

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 238 OF 2019

¶4

Dinesh Vasant Kamble … Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶5

Mr. Ashok B. Tajane for Applicant.

¶6

Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for Respondent – State.

¶7

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE : JANUARY 28, 2019.

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

. Heard learned Counsel for Applicant and the learned APP.

¶10

In Crime No. 848 of 2018 for an offence punishable under

¶11

Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, the Applicant is seeking pre-arrest bail. Perused the contents of First Information Report.

¶12

The plain reading of the First Information Report and other material does not repose the confidence in the prosecution theory as narrated in the complaint.

¶13

2/3

¶14

Yadav 26.aba.238.19

¶15

It is the case of the complainant that first time when she visited at the house of her parents after her divorce, the incident in question happened. It is also claimed that physical relationship continued from 2013 to 2018. The very narration depicts that the necessary ingredients of Section 376 are not satisfied, as there appears to be a consent theory.

¶16

As such, a case for grant of anticipatory bail to the Applicant is made out. Hence, the following order.

¶17

ORDER

¶18

(A) In the event of arrest in Crime No. 848 of 2018 for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, the Applicant be released on executing PR Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount.

¶19

(B) The Applicant shall attend the Investigating Officer on 4^th , 7^th , 11^th & 14^th February 2019 between 10.00 a.m. to 12.00 noon and thereafter as and when directed by the Investigating Officer.

¶20

¶21

3/3 Yadav 26.aba.238.19

¶22

The Applicant undertakes to co-operate the investigating

¶23

agency and also volunteers to undergo the medical check-up in the offence

¶24

in question.

¶25

Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶26

(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

Dinesh Vasant Kamble v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Vasant Kamble v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhijeet Chandrakant Mohite Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mahinder Jograj Singh and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Hanmant Ananta Bhosale and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Jyotiram @ Ashok Saudagar Kshirsagar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mangesh Vithal Bhorekar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shashank Kshamanath Dubey Vs the State of Maharashtra