The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the withdrawal of Bail Application No.1597 of 2019 on the submission that the applicant received instructions to withdraw. The application was disposed of without hearing on merits.
Application withdrawn and disposed of without hearing on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rpa 1/1 503-ba-1597-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1597 OF 2019
Santosh Bhagwan Jadhav & Anr. .. Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr.Satyavrat Joshi i/b. Mr.Jaydeep D. Mane, Advocate for the Applicants.
Mr.S.H. Yadav, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATED : DECEMBER 04, 2019.
P.C. :
Not on Board. Mentioned. Taken on Board.
2 It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the Applicants that the advocate on record received instructions from the client to withdraw the Application. Hence, Application is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of. The Application was not heard on merits.
Santosh Bhagwan Jadhav & Anr.
State of Maharashtra
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
