Allowed

All India Council for Technical Education through Its the Regional Officer and Dy. Director v. Rajesh Mohanrao Gudmalwar and Ors.

Bombay HC1 Mar 2019CAO/521/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil applications for condonation of delay in filing review petitions were allowed by a single-judge bench of the Bombay High Court, dispensing with court notice on service similar to the last instance but requiring private service on respondents.

What did the court decide?

Condono 113-day delay; registration of review petitions; notice to serve privately.

All India Council for Technical Education… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

cao520,521-18.doc

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.520 OF 2018 IN REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO. 34719 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.14344 OF 2016

¶6

All India Council for Technical Education Through its Regional Officer ...Applicant/Petitioner

¶7

(Original Respondent No.4)

¶8

vs.

¶9

Medha Bharat Petkar (Smt. Medharani @ Abhijita Bhanudas Vanarase) And Ors.

¶10

...Respondents

¶11

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.521 OF 2018 IN REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO. 34716 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.398 OF 2017

¶12

All India Council for Technical Eduction Through its Regional Officer ...Applicant/Petitioner (Original Respondent No.4)

¶13

vs. Rajesh Mohanrao Gudmalwar And Ors. ...Respondents

¶14

Mr. Abhijeet A. Joshi, for the Applicant/Review Petitioner.

¶15

CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.

¶16

DATED: 1 MARCH, 2019

¶17

P.C. :

¶18

. Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant (the Review Petitioner, who was original Respondent No.4 in the writ petitions). A

¶19

Pg 1 of 2

¶20

cao520,521-18.doc

¶21

Court notice has been issued in the civil applications. There is, however, no report of service. The same position had obtained on the last date, i.e. on 25 February 2019. The application has been served, however, by private notice on the Respondents. The Applicant-Review Petitioner has filed an affidavit in proof of such private service. Based on this affidavit, the civil applications are heard.

¶22

The civil applications seek condonation of delay of 113 days in filing the review petitions. A reasonable excuse for not preferring the application till the date of its filing is made out in the civil applications. The civil applications are, accordingly, allowed and the delay is condoned. Office to register the review petition and place the same for admission on 20 March 2019. The Review Petitioner to serve the petition privately on the Respondents to the review petition and file an affidavit of service by the next date.

¶23

( S.C. GUPTE, J. )

¶24

Pg 2 of 2

All India Council for Technical Education through Its the Regional Officer and Dy. Director v. Rajesh Mohanrao Gudmalwar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

All India Council for Technical Education through Its the Regional Officer and Dy. Director v. Rajesh Mohanrao Gudmalwar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Shaan Uttamsingh and Mr Sameer Uttamsingh Vs Shamraovithal Coop Bank and 3 Ors.

Siemens Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sai Infosystem (India) Limited and 7 Ors.

Zte Corporation Vs Loop Mobile (India) Limited and 11 Ors.

All India Council for Technical Education through Its the Regional Officer and Dy. Director Vs Medha Bharat Petkar (Smt. Medharani @ Abhijita Bhanudas Vanarase and Ors.

M/S. Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. Vs M/S. Varia Engineering Works Private Limited and 3 Ors.

All India Council for Technical Education through Its the Regional Officer and Dy. Director Vs Medha Bharat Petkar (Smt. Medharani @ Abhijita Bhanudas Vanarase and Ors.