High Court Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction restored three Criminal Revision Applications to original file and disposed of current Criminal Applications, as charges in respective Sessions Cases were not framed.
Three criminal revision applications restored to original file; Criminal Applications 331, 332, 333 disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
appr.331.2018+_903to905.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.331 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.81 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.186 OF 2018
Vinod Chandulal Shah … Applicant
Vs.
Securities and Exchange Board of India & anr. … Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.332 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.83 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.188 OF 2018
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.333 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.86 OF 2018 IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.190 OF 2018
Mr.Akshit Jain i/b Rinku Valunju for the Applicant in all APPRs
Mr.Raghav Shekhar i/b The Law Point for Resp. No.1
Mr.Vinod Chate, APP, for the Respondent – State
CORAM: Mrs.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATED: JANUARY 10, 2019
Page 1 of 3
appr.331.2018+_903to905.doc
P.C.:
Page 2 of 3
appr.331.2018+_903to905.doc
file alongwith the criminal applications for condonation of delay therein.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether three criminal revision applications disposed off as infructuous should be restored for admission as charges were not framed.
Vinod Chandulal Shah
Securities and Exchange Board of India
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
